Legal Opinion
Sutherland v. Brennan
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 8, 1995No. CC 9210-07134; CA A80719; SC S41835PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The issue in this case is whether the trial court properly granted defendant’s motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. ORCP 21 A. A divided Court of Appeals, sitting in banc, affirmed the decision of the trial court. Sutherland v. Brennan, 131 Or App 25, 883 P2d 1318 (1994). For the reasons that follow, we also affirm, but on different grounds from those relied on by the Court of Appeals.
In October 1992, plaintiff, acting as conservator of the estate of his sister, filed a complaint in the circuit court against defendant, a lawyer practicing in California,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Brennen v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State Ex Rel. White Lumber Sales, Inc. v. SulmonettiOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. Circus Circus Reno, Inc. v. PopeOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Stringer v. Car Data Systems, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- O'BRYAN v. McDonaldWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- O'Neil v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- Ram Technical Services, Inc. v. KoreskoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- In re the Marriage of AdamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.