Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided December 19, 2013No. CC 0904-05047; CA A143846; SC S060226PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
Plaintiff, an Oregon resident, sustained injuries in a motorcycle accident that occurred in Wyoming. She subsequently filed an action in Oregon seeking damages for her injuries, naming as a defendant Grand Teton Cycles, LLC, a Harley-Davidson franchisee with a physical presence in Idaho and Wyoming. The trial court determined that it lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant and granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. The Court of Appeals affirmed. Robinson v. Harley-Davidson Motor Co., 247 Or App 587, 270 P3d 367 (2012). We allowed plaintiff’s petition for review to determine…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barrett v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2017
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Cougar Sport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2016
- Dept. of Human Services v. C. M. H.Oregon Supreme Court · 2021
- Munson v. Valley Energy Investment Fund, U. S., LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Hinrichs v. General Motors of Canada, Ltd.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.