Legal Opinion

McGuiggan v. Hiller

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1932PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

At the time of the accident plaintiff was driving west from Madison to Verona in a Chevrolet coupé. A truck owned by defendant was being driven east upon the *404same highway, and was operated by an employee of the defendant. Defendant’s truck was equipped with a rack, which was between eighty-five and eighty-six inches in width, and which extended about nine inches out from the body of the truck on either side. The accident happened at 2 a.m. on June- 25, 1931, and the truck carried no clearance lights or any other lights to designate it as a truck. This was in violation of sec. 85.06, Stats.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Samulski v. Menasha Paper Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Stryk v. SydarowichWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Brown v. HaertelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Davis v. SkilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bent v. JonetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Gilson v. Drees Bros.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Quady v. SicklWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Heiden v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API