Legal Opinion

United States v. Rodriquez

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 16, 1980No. CM 439107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

In this case the appellant asks the Court to adopt the rule promulgated by the United States Air Force Court of Military Review in United States v. Boston, 7 M.J. 954 (A.F.C.M.R.1979), requiring the staff judge advocate to submit to the convening authority a response to any comment made by the trial defense counsel to the staff judge advocate’s review pursuant to United States v. Goode, 1 M.J. 3 (C.M.A.1975).1 We decline to do so.

We concede that in many cases it will be beneficial to the convening authority and to the appellate agencies for the staff judge advocate to make…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. HendonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  3. United States v. BostonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. ShyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. ReedU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1984
  3. United States v. WalkerU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API