Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Warwick

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 3, 1926PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Superior Court, wherein it was adjudged that certain real estate, which stood in the names of Etta Tayne Hazen and Florence H. Warwick, was and is the property of the copartnership composed of E. Roscoe Hazen and Earl A. Warwick, known as the Hazen & Warwick Garage; that the defendant Joseph Hart holds such interest in the same as may have been conveyed to him by the defendant Florence H. Warwick, by deed, in which the defendant Earl A. Warwick joined, as trustee for the benefit of the said copartnership, subject to the obligation of the defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barnard v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. Tobin v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Mansfield v. HodgdonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  4. Preferred Underwriters, Inc. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  5. Staples v. MullenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Donahue v. Rodd Electrotype Co. of New England, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. United States v. James R. CosonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Porter v. HarringtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Limpus v. ArmstrongMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1975
  5. New England Trust Co. v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API