Legal Opinion

Kraemer v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1960No. Civ. 18890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment on a jury verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff real estate broker for a commission in the amount of $14,155.80 for the sale of ranch property in Santa Clara County. The sole issue is whether there is any substantial evidence to establish an oral waiver or extension of time by the seller for the performance by the plaintiff broker of an exclusive written authorization to sell.

Having in mind the familiar rule that on appeal all conflicts must be resolved in favor of the respondent and all legitimate and reasonable inferences indulged in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Augustine v. TruccoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  2. McPhail v. BuellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Jamison v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ford v. Palisades Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Kroger v. BaurCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Galwey v. Pacific Auto Stages, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Wm. E. Doud & Co. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Valkama v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. James Myers & Associates Inc. v. National Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  5. Hughes v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API