Valkama v. Harris
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice, and RABINO WITZ, CONNOR and BURKE, Justices. CONNOR, Justice.
The question raised by this appeal concerning a real estate broker’s commission is whether the superior court properly granted appellees’ motion for summary judgment. We are of the opinion that appellees were entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Therefore, we affirm.
In ruling on a motion for summary judgment all reasonable inferences from the proofs offered are drawn against the moving party, and are viewed in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Wilson v. Pollet, 416…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wilson v. PolletAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
- Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. GomesAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
- Alaska Creamery Products, Inc. v. WellsAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
- Northern Lights Motel, Inc. v. SweaneyAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- Baker v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- B-E-C-K Constructors v. State, Department of HighwaysAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Black v. DahlAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Mat-Su/Blackard/Stephan & Sons v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Leadership Real Estate v. HarperNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Bowers v. Alaska State Employees Federal Credit UnionAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.