Ann Howard's Apricots Restaurant, Inc. v. Commission On Human Rights & Opportunities
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKatz, J.
The principal issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that a hearing officer for the commission on human rights and opportunities had abused her discretion in failing to strike the direct testimony of a defendant who died before he could be fully cross-examined. We disagree in part with the trial court and, consequently, reverse the judgment in part.
This case began in 1991 when the defendant John Doe II, a waiter employed at the plaintiff restaurant, Ann Howard’s Apricots Restaurant, Inc. (plaintiff), filed a complaint with the named defendant, the commission on human…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Alvin Joel TYLER, Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant, v. BETHLEHEM STEEL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Levy v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Olson v. Accessory Controls & Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Cweklinsky v. Mobil Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Crest Pontiac Cadillac, Inc. v. HadleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Sorrentino v. All Seasons Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.