Legal Opinion
In re Ricky P.
New York City Family Court
Decided February 18, 1987PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*29OPINION OF THE COURT
Bruce M. Kaplan, J.
Rose V., the paternal grandmother of Ricky P., also known as Felix Ricky L., has moved to intervene in this child protective proceeding. It affords the court, in a case of apparent first impression, an opportunity to construe Family Court Act § 1035 (e), added by Laws of 1986 (ch 699, eff Aug. 30, 1986).
Family Court Act § 1035 (e) provides: "The child’s adult sibling, grandparent, aunt or uncle not named as respondent in the petition, may, upon consent of the child’s parent appearing in the proceeding, or where such parent has not appeared then without…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Daghir v. DaghirAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Daghir v. DaghirNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Hotze v. HotzeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Parker v. FordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re HolmesNew York City Family Court · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re Tristram K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Sierra H.New York City Family Court · 1988
- Marylou L. v. Tenecha L.New York City Family Court · 1999
- A.B. v. D.W.New York City Family Court · 2007
- K.S. v. Brookwood Child CareNew York City Family Court · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.