Legal Opinion
In re Holmes
New York City Family Court
Decided December 31, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*279OPINION OF THE COURT
Jeffry H. Gallet, J.
This year, the Legislature amended Family Court Act § 1035 by adding subdivision (d) which grants a nonrespondent parent in child protective proceedings "the right to appear and participate in the proceeding as an interested party intervenor for the purpose of seeking temporary and permanent custody of the child.” (L 1986, ch 699, § 1.) Here, the nonrespondent father, who has been granted intervenor status in this child protective proceeding in which his child’s mother is the respondent, moves, pursuant to section 1035 (d), to be permitted full party…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York Central Railroad v. LefkowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re Telsa Z.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re Ricky P.New York City Family Court · 1987
- Rockland County Department of Social Services ex rel. McM. v. Brian McM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re Sierra H.New York City Family Court · 1988