Legal Opinion
O'ROURKE v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 22, 1969No. 42920Published
1Opinion of the Court
457 P.2d 782 (1969)
Dan F. O'ROURKE, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
The CITY OF TULSA, a Municipal Corporation, Defendant in Error and Cross-Petitioner in Error,
Ira J. Dietrich and Other Persons Similarly Situated, Intervenors-Defendants in Error.
No. 42920.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
July 22, 1969.
Byron S. Matthews, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.
Charles E. Norman, City Atty., William M. Northcutt, Roy Hinkle, Asst. City Attys., Tom F. Birmingham, Legal Intern, Tulsa, for cross-petitioner in error.
Houston, Klein & Davidson, R.L. Davidson, Jr., J. Barry Epperson, Tulsa, for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Pyatt v. Mayor and Council of Borough of DunellenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Hunzicker v. PulliamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Beveridge v. Harper & Turner Oil TrustSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- In Re DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Grantham v. City of ChickashaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.