Legal Opinion

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Darnell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 23, 1914No. 3263PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Myrtle Darnell, administratrix, against the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

On or about April 5, 1910, W. C. Darnell, while in the performance of his duty, as head brakeman, fell from defendant’s train and was killed at a point about one mile north of Scullin, Okla. The said train was being run from Francis, Okla., to Sherman, in the state of Texas, and was engaged in interstate business.

This suit is brought by Myrtle Darnell, his widow, in her capacity as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband. It is claimed that the deceased lost his life because of the negligence of the defendant railroad, and the allegations of negligence are, in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Coalgate Co. v. HurstSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. HessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Petroleum Iron Works Co. v. WantlandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  5. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. AshlockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Ponca City Ice Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Highway Construction Co. v. ShueSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Weleetka Cotton Oil Co. v. BrookshireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Lusk v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API