Legal Opinion

State v. Freeland

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1983No. TC C81-04-32282; CA A22721; SC 28856PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*369LINDE, J.

Oregon law provides that a person may be charged with a felony either by grand jury indictment or by a district attorney’s information filed in circuit court after a showing of probable cause in a preliminary hearing before a magistrate, unless the accused waives either indictment or the preliminary hearing. Or Const art VII (amended), § 5(3) to (5); ORS 135.070-135.185. Administration of the system of initiating a prosecution, including this choice of procedure, ordinarily is in the hands of the district attorney, except in the rare instance when a grand jury may indict upon…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Hawkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. CunninghamOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  3. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. FarrarOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1987

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API