Legal Opinion

Tarquinio v. Diglio

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 2, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff, Angelo Tarquinio, brought an action against the defendant, Nicholas C. Diglio, 1 to recover for damages sustained by Tarquinio when the vehicles operated by the two men -collided at the intersection of route 34 and Chestnut Ridge Road in Orange. Judgment was rendered on a jury verdict for the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.

Three claims of error are asserted by the plaintiff: (1) the admission into evidence of certain photographs of the scene taken by Diglio and his brother five to six hours after the accident; (2) the admission of “hearsay” testimony by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Waldron v. RaccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
  2. Cunningham, Admx. v. Fair Haven Westville R. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Cagianello v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Plisko v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Giannitti v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  4. Madsen v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  5. Diener v. TiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API