Curtis v. Upton
California Supreme Court
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Marin County, from an order denying a new trial, and from an order refusing a Writ of Restitution. Edgar T. Zook, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Robert Harrison, Thomas P. Boyd, Morrison, Dunne & Brobeck, and Edward Lynch, for Appellants. George H. Harlan, and R. H. Countryman, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The above-entitled actions involve the same controversy. Case No. 7095 is an action in ejectment and the plaintiffs J. F. D. Curtis and H. L. Curtis appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion for a new trial. In case No. 7096 the same persons appeal from an order denying their application, as successors of A. D. Easkoot, for the issuance of a writ of restitution upon a judgment entered in said action in favor of said Easkoot against the plaintiff and intervener. We will consider the cases in the order of their number on our calendar.
1. No. 7095. CURTIS v. UPTON.
The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lamb v. WahlenmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Foss v. JohnstoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Strand Improvement Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- Landregan v. PeppinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State of California Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Whittier v. VisscherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- City of Los Angeles v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Carpenter v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Creditors Adjustment Co. v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.