Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. Klein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Action by Emil Klein, to the use of George Baglin, against the Title Guaranty & Surety Company. Judgment for complainant (166 Fed. 365), and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
This case arose out of the same state of facts as those that have been recited in the case of this plaintiff in error against George Baglin (No. 55, October Term) 178 Fed. 682, ".nd it has been agreed between counsel that the facts set forth in the record of that case, so far as they are relevant, will be considered as part of the record in this case.
Linderman and the plaintiff in error, the surety company, occupied positions in this transaction similar to those that they occupied in the *690Baglin Case, and in each instance the plaintiff below was acting on behalf of F. A.…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. BaglinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1909
3Cited by12 opinions
- K-ROM Construction Corp. v. Behling (In Re K-ROM Construction Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Oil City Motor Co. v. CIT CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Merrick v. PattisonWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Universal Credit Co. v. LowellRochester City Court · 1938
- Du Pont v. DeputyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1938
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.