Legal Opinion

Oil City Motor Co. v. CIT Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1935No. 1151PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRATTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an action to recover for alleged usurious interest exacted and paid. Plaintiff was a dealer in DeSoto and Plymouth automobiles at Tulsa, Okl. It purchased new automobiles from the manufacturer in Detroit, Mich., at wholesale for cash and sold them at retail in Tulsa and adjacent trade territory. It was obligated by contract to purchase 300 DeSoto and 200 Plymouth automobiles during the year 1932. Mo'st of its sales at retail were made for part cash, part deferred payments, and a used automobile taken in trade. That method of purchase and sale necessitated more…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seeman v. Philadelphia Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. In Re James, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  3. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. HupferNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Mid-West Chevrolet Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
  5. Ryttenberg v. ScheferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1904

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Rattan v. Commercial Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  2. Klett v. Security Acceptance Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Glenn P. Maulding v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  4. Lamb v. Ed Maher, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Penn Yan Agway Cooperative, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API