Legal Opinion

Bricker v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 27, 1946No. Appeals, 7 and 8PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Jttstice Linn,

These appeals are from the refusal of defendants’ motions for judgment on the record after disagreement of the jury: Act of April 20, 1911, P. L. 70, 12 P.S. 684. Judge Woodside’s opinion, reported in 56 Dauphin County Reports 384, adequately disposes of the motions for judgment.

The plaintiff, in his employer’s truck driven by another employee, was injured when the truck collided with a parked truck belonging to the defendant, the City of Harrisburg, in charge of Gardner, the other defendant. The truck was parked in a “No Parking” zone. An ordinance prohibited…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Kline v. Moyer and AlbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Ashworth v. HannumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Purol, Inc. v. Great Eastern System, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. DeLuca v. Manchester Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  2. Mazi v. McANLISSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. DeWaele v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Steele v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Pleasant v. CarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API