Legal Opinion
Burlington-Chicago Cartage, Inc. v. United States
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided November 27, 1959No. P-2240PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERCER, District Judge.
By its complaint against the United States of America, plaintiff seeks to review several orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission and prays that such orders be vacated and set aside. By order entered July 27,1959, the Interstate Commerce Commission was joined as an intervening defendant.
Defendants, by their joint answer, averred, that the complaint fails to state a cause of action, basing that position principally upon the decision in Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United States, 345 U.S. 507, 73 S.Ct. 803, 97 L.Ed. 1206. Further answering, in the alternative,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Federal Power Commission v. Idaho Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Sanford v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Andrew G. Nelson, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Callanan Road Improvement Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- T. I. McCormack Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1966
- Baggett Transportation Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1964
- Keystone Motor Express, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1964
- Beaufort Transfer Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
- Cape Air Freight, Inc., a Corporation v. United States of America and the Interstate Commerce Commission, Pinto Trucking Service, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.