Butterick Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The industry affected by this order has for its purpose the enabling of a woman to purchase a pattern for a dress or other piece of wearing apparel, and to use it as a pattern upon a sufficient amount of material to make the article in her own home, thus avoiding the outside tailoring or purchasing of ready-made garments. This, it is said, reduces the cost of women’s garments- very materially. She contributes her own labor and skill, using the pattern as a guide. The manufacturer creates a design, and from it a master pattern is made. Other patterns are cut out of tissue…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Federal Trade Commission v. Beech-Nut Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Standard Fashion Co. v. Magrane-Houston Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Bauer & Cie v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Pepsico, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, Pepsi-Cola Bottling Company of Corvallis, Inc., Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- State v. Miles Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.