Legal Opinion

Sloo v. Roberts

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1855PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Knox Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Assumpsit by George L. and James H. Roberts, administrators of Edmund Roberts, deceased, against Albert G. Sloo, the assignor of a promissory note made on the 17th of May, 1837, by one Andrew Heredeth, at Alton, Illinois, whereby he promised to pay to the order of said Sloo, twelve months after date, 1,462 dollars and 50 cents. Before the day of payment arrived, Sloo assigned the note to Edmund Roberts. It is averred in the declaration that said note is lost; also that when it became due, Heredeth was utterly insolvent, and continued so up until his death, which occurred in September, 1839,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Renner v. Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. Fintard v. TackingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1813
  3. Gronour v. DanielsIndiana Supreme Court · 1844

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Torr v. TorrIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Elliott v. WoodwardIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  3. Adams v. BakerSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1887
  4. Embree v. EmersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. Peter & Burghard Stone Co. v. CarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API