Legal Opinion
Jarman v. Hale
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 1992No. 18801PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUBSTITUTE OPINION
This Court’s prior opinion dated April 22, 1992, is hereby withdrawn.
SWANSTROM, Judge.
Tom Hale appeals from a partial summary judgment of September 18, 1990, which dismissed most of Hale’s counterclaims against his former attorney Ronald J. Jarman. Hale contends in this appeal that the district court erred in dismissing his claims against Jarman for negligence, breach of fiduciary trust, breach of the implied covenant of good faith, defamation, fraud, and fraud upon the court as alleged in the amended counterclaim. He also contends that District Judge Granata should have…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Hughes v. MaloneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Umphrey v. SprinkelIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Town of Telluride v. Lot Thirty-Four Venture, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Samuel v. Hepworth, Nungester & Lezamiz, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Puckett v. VerskaIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- Kathie and Joe Boyer v. Kai Morimoto, MD and Plastic Surgery NorthwestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Ashsha East v. Alan J. CoffelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994