Legal Opinion

Umphrey v. Sprinkel

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1983No. 13600, 13601PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants-appellants for fraudulent misrepresentations made in the sale of real property. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

In 1962, defendant-appellant Gary Sprinkel purchased a one-half interest in a parcel of land of about 670 acres, known as Lone Mountain Ranch. His father and mother were the purchasers of the other one-half interest. On that property was a well. Originally it had been drilled as an oil well to a depth of 1700 feet, but it never produced any oil, and it was converted to a water well at about 400 feet…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Cheney v. Palos Verdes Investment Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Ellis v. CrockettHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Boise Dodge, Inc. v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hatfield v. Max Rouse & Sons NorthwestIdaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Gavica v. HansonIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. StamperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. George W. Watkins Family v. MessengerIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bongiovi v. SullivanNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Blake v. CruzIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  5. McCoy v. LyonsIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API