People v. Ramirez
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of conviction, and an order denying the defendant a new trial, in the Superior Court of San Bernardino. Rolfe, J.
1Opinion of the Court
McKee, J.:
The defendant was indicted for murder. On his arraignment, his counsel made a motion to set aside the indictment upon the ground that one Celis, who was a deputy sheriff and liad arrested the defendant, and was also a witness against him, had acted as interpreter in the examination of witnesses against him before the grand jury, and was present at the exaination of such witnesses by the grand jury. The motion was denied, and the ruling is assigned as error.
1. The presence of the interpreter before the grand jury was necessary, and the law allowed it. (Stats. 1871-72, p. 540.) But it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- People v. YbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. SiemsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- People v. DormanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- State v. HallNevada Supreme Court · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.