Legal Opinion
Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 27, 1923No. Nos. 2933, 2934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
By the bill in equity filed in this suit the plaintiff zinc companies sought an injunction permanently enjoining the defendant oil company from disconnecting certain of its natural gas wells from the plaintiffs’ pipe line and from refusing to furnish them with gas through their pipe line drawn from wells in an area belonging to the defendant and known as the “Smelter Primary Zone.’.’ The court entered a decree granting substantially- the prayers of the bill and providing, inter alia, for the connection- of the plaintiffs’ pipe line with the defendant’s gas wells…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Howell v. City of Hamburg Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Fitzgerald v. First Nat. Bank of Rapid CityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. StumpCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1898
- Shamp v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re RuskayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
- Norton Iron Works v. Standard Slag Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926
- Bartlesville Zinc Co. v. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1926
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924