Legal Opinion

Norton Iron Works v. Standard Slag Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1926No. 4579PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

The Norton Iron Works is engaged in the manufacture of iron. A by-product is slag. The Standard Slag Company contracted for all the slag to be produced at the iron works plant from June 27,1919, until December 31,1921. The slag is drawn in liquid form from the iroü ore, and in this case was caused to run from the furnace through a semicircular trough to a pit, where it was stored. Some of it, because it solidifies rapidly after leaving the furnace, would adhere to the trough during the flow. It was necessary to employ workmen to remove this slag and keep the trough…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Griffin v. Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Pressed Steel Car Co. v. Union Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
  5. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. Bartlesville Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Columbia Gas Const. Co. v. HolbrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  3. W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  4. Walter Kidde & Co. v. Walton-Viking Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1946
  5. United States Quarry Tile Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API