Legal Opinion
Stockton East Water District and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2013No. 04-541LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contract damages; expectation damages; cost of cover; reasonableness of mitigation; foreseeability; causation of damages.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CLAIMS OF CENTRAL SAN JOAQUIN WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case, before the court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, involves a dispute over two water supply contracts. Plaintiffs Stockton East Water District (“Stockton East”) and Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District (“Central”) (collectively, “plaintiffs” or the “districts”) are water agencies organized under…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United States v. Tohono O’odham NationSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Glendale Federal Bank, Fsb, Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Indiana Michigan Power Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Bluebonnet Savings Bank, F.S.B., Stone Capital, Inc. (Formerly Known as Cfsb Corporation), and James M. Fail v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- GULF GROUP GENERAL ENTERPRISES CO. W.L.L., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES, DefendantUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Fisher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Englewood Terrace Ltd. Partnership v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.