Legal Opinion

Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 6, 1989No. 887SC961PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

A motion for summary judgment will be granted if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with any affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. N.C.G.S. § 1A-1, Rule 56(c); Stoltz v. Burton, 69 N.C. App. 231, 316 S.E. 2d 646 (1984). The moving party has the burden of establishing the absence of any triable issue of fact. Id. at 233, 313 S.E. 2d at 647.

Although summary judgment is generally not appropriate in negligence cases, it is appropriate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Garner v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Ratliff v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Stone v. Texas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  5. Hale v. Duke Power Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Holshouser v. Shaner Hotel Group Properties One Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Williams v. TysingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Yates v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Mizell v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API