Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Caruso
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 4, 1928PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
There has already been an opinion written upon various phases of the litigation in this case. Caruso v. Caruso, 102 N.J. Eq. 393. The decision here to be made is largely the application of law already decided in the case cited, where I said (at p.395): "As to the validity in New Jersey, by comity, of the Italian decree. Assuming that this decree, and amendments, made in Italy upon the application of the Caruso heirs [named in his testamentary paper filed there], who were all present before the court and who had entered into a family agreement or settlement which the court approved, operated…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Amparo Mining Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- In re the estate of BuzbySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
- Earle v. American Sugar Refining Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Prudential Ins. v. Merritt-Chapman ScottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- First Camden, Trust v. Hiram Lodge No. 81New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1944
- Pryor v. CraftSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
- In Re ThurstonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1929
- Phair v. Federal Deposit Ins. CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.