Legal Opinion
Phair v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corporation
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided October 24, 1947No. Civil 1105PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Distict Judge.
This is a civil action under the Banking Act of 1935 as amended, 12 U.S.C.A. § 264. The complaint consists of five counts in each of which the plaintiffs therein named assert a claim for money allegedly due them under the Act on certain insured deposits. The defendant in its answer denies liability, and alleges by way of affirmative defense full payment of the money due.
Findings of Fact.
I. The decedent, William F. Melosh, died testate on October 18, 1937, survived by his widow Louise W. Melosh and his-three children, Rudolph C. Melosh, Margaret M. Rusch, and Elizabeth M.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Gates v. Plainfield Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Berger v. BurnettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1924
- In re the Estate of HibblerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1910
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eli B. Jones, of the Estate of Jesse L. Bobo, Deceased v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Jennings v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- DeLorenzo v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Estate of Dawson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
- Louis Bulasky v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.