Amparo Mining Co. v. Fidelity Trust Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On appeal from an order of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Stevenson, whose opinion is reported in 71¡. N. J. Eq. (J/. Buck.) 197.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The bill charges that the complainant is a New Jersey corporation; that Paxson was its president and chairman of the executive committee; that as a result of transactions with Williams and Graham, which need not here be set forth, Paxson advanced $40,000 to settle their claims against the complainant, and acquired from them five hundred and forty-nine thousand five hundred and four shares of the capital stock of the complainant; that this stock is the property of the complainant, subject only to the repayment of the advance of $40,000, with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Arndt v. GriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Hart v. SansomSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3Cited by27 opinions
- Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
- Atkinson v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Swetland v. SwetlandNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1930
- Elgart v. MintzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938
- Cameron v. Penn Mutual Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.