Legal Opinion

Earle v. American Sugar Refining Co.

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided September 15, 1908PublishedCited by 22 opinions

On bill for accounting by George H. Earle, Jr., auxiliary receiver of the Pennsylvania Sugar Eefining Company, against the American Sugar Eefining Company.

1Opinion of the Court

Walker, V. C.

The bill in this case prays that it may be decreed that the defendant, the American Sugar Refining Company, on December 30th, 1903, became trustee in the control of the affairs and plant of tire Pennsylvania Sugar Refining Company, for the benefit of that company and its creditors and stockholders; that as such trustee the defendant make discovery of all profits made and acquired by it by reason of its actions in controlling the . affairs and plant of the Pennsylvania. Sugar Refining Company, and account to the complainant as auxiliary receiver of that company for such profits;…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Mercantile Bank v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Kenny v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  4. Bradley v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1875
  5. States v. DurkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Federal Title, C., Guaranty Co. v. LowensteinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
  3. Fortugno v. Hudson Manure Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. Girard Trust Co. v. SchmitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1941
  5. In Re HagueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API