Legal Opinion
The Cleona
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 28, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLSEY, District Judge.
This motion is granted in respect of all these interrogatories except Nos. 1, la, 2b, and 2c. The Reading Company, as claimant of the Cleona, must answer the interrogatories which are hereby sustained within ten days from service on its proctors of the order to be entered herein.
In this ease the New York Central Railroad Company has libeled two vessels, the tug Reichert and its tow, the barge Cleona, for damage to its submarine cables laid on the bed of the Harlem river. The damage is alleged to have been caused on October 1, 1928, by the negligent navigation of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The HudsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1883
- Andrews v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- The AlertDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1889
- Salmon v. The SerapisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1889
- The EpsilonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dowling v. Isthmian S.S. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Petition of New Jersey Barging CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
- Dalzell v. Valvoline Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1934
- Phillips v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Citro Chemical Co. of America v. Bank Line Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.