Legal Opinion

The Hudson

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 7, 1883PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Motion to Bring in Another Vessel as Defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

The libel in this case was filed against the steam-tug Hudson to recover damages for an injury by a collision to the *163libelant’s barge, which was in tow of the steam-tug E. A. Packer. The latter tug not having been joined in the suit, and being alleged by the claimants of the Hudson to be chargeable with fault contributing to the collision, the claimants have filed a petition praying that the E. A. Packer may be brought in as a party to the action, in order that the damages may be apportioned between the two tugs, as would have been done had the E. A. Packer been joined as a party and adjudged…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wayman v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. The "Atlas."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Story v. LivingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  4. The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. The " Alabama " & the " Game-Cock."Supreme Court of the United States · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Karam v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
  2. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc. v. Delta Marine Drilling Company, Delta Marine Drilling Company v. Tri-State Oil Tool Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. British Transport Commission v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Drake Towing Company, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Meisner Marine Construction Company v. United States of America, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API