Legal Opinion

Phillips v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided January 14, 1955No. 26440PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLIVER J. CARTER, Judge.

Respondent’s motion to dismiss the first amended libel turns upon whether the practice of suing parties by fictitious names is permissible in an admiralty suit.

One of libelant’s proctors sets forth by affidavit that libelant came to his office about three days before the statute of limitations would have become a bar to libelant’s suit, and informed him that libelant was injured while working as a stevedore aboard the S. S. Cape Clear; that the first information given to libel-*914ant’s proctor as to the ownership of that vessel was that the vessel was owned by the United…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cosmopolitan Shipping Co. v. McAllisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Levinson v. DeupreeSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Deupree v. LevinsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
  4. Town of Hancock v. . First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Jacobs v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Craig v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1967
  4. Skibs A/S Abaco, Aruba, Astrea & Noruega v. Ardeshir B. Cursetjee & Sons, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API