Legal Opinion

Dalzell v. Valvoline Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 27, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HULBERT, District Judge.

Libelant claims that his tug sustained injuries to its propeller by striking a sunken pile under water on land belonging to the respondent. The alleged sunken and broken pile was close to one of respondent’s piers at Edgewater, N. J. Respondent stresses the fact that libelant gave no notice of the accident and made no claim until upwards of five weeks after the alleged accident.

This is a motion by respondent to overrule libelant’s exceptions to respondent’s interrogatories, forty in number.

On the motion it was agreed that twenty-eight are to be answered; eight were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The CleonaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930
  2. Erie & Western Transp. Co. v. Great Lakes Towing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1910
  3. Honolulu S. S. Co. v. Hudson River Day LineDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stark v. American Dredging Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Mulligan v. Eastern S. S. Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1946
  3. Viront v. Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1950
  4. Corbett v. Columbia Transp. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1946
  5. Shelton v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1939

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API