Legal Opinion

Freeman, Etc. v. Rogal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1944No. Appeal, 195PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Hoeace Steen,

The Secretary of Banking took possession of Pittsburgh-American Bank and Trust Company on September 25, 1981. On November 18, 1931, he determined, as Receiver, to liquidate its business and property. On February 1, 1939, he decided to enforce the additional statutory liability of the stockholders for the debts of the bank and gave written notice of assessment and demand for payment on or before March 6,1939. On October 1, 1941, he brought this suit in assumpsit against one of the stockholders who had failed to pay the assessment. The action was defended on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Gordon, SEC. of Bk. v. BiesingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Harr, SEC. of Banking v. MikalariasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. CabalikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Freeman v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Freeman, Etc. v. ScurrySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Kelly v. BremmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Freeman v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Freeman v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API