Bell, Secy. of Banking v. Cabalik
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
This appeal is from a judgment entered for want of a sufficient affidavit of defense in an action of assumpsit brought by the Secretary of Banking, as receiver of Pittsburgh-American Bank and Trust Company, to recover from a stockholder a stock assessment equal to the par value of her shares.
The questions raised by the appeal are the following: (1) Is the provision for shareholders’ individual liability contained in section 5 of the Act of 1876, P. L. 161, violative of Article III, section 3, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania? (2) As applied to banks of deposit organized under…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kirschler v. WainwrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- Gordon v. WinnebergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Harr, SEC. of Bkg. v. BoucherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Bell v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Freeman, Etc. v. HiznaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Freeman, Etc. v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Freeman v. HudockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Freeman, Etc. v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944