Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Abraham

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 26, 1945No. Appeal, 175Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This appeal raises the question whether the Secretary of Banking, as receiver of a closed bank, having made one assessment for 100% against the stockholders, may subsequently make another assessment for 100% against the same stockholders. The court below held that he may not.

On January 27, 1932, the Secretary of Banking, as receiver, entered into possession of The Pennsylvania Deposit Bank of McKeesport. On March 22, 1932, he concluded that the bank should be liquidated. On May 31, 1934, the Secretary, having determined that the bank’s assets were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Freeman, Etc. v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Freeman v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API