Legal Opinion

Freeman v. Brady

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1945No. Appeal, 36PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

The suit began by the Secretary’s bill for a decree requiring defendants, as shareholders of a trust company in liquidation, to pay unpaid stock subscriptions. Preliminary objections were filed, asserting that the remedy was at law and that the claims were barred by limitation. As the statute expressly authorized the Secretary to bring such suits “at law or in equity,” we reversed and remitted the record for trial (1) whether the Secretary had made demand on the shareholders within a reasonable time, and (2) whether the action was barred, 346 Pa. 666. The court…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bell, Secy. of Banking v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  2. Harr, SEC. of Banking v. MikalariasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Freeman, Etc. v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Bell v. CullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Neel v. Oliver EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Kelly v. BremmermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Freeman v. AbrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Kelly v. JohncoxNew York Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API