Legal Opinion
Bertram v. Poole
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1999No. C5-99-136PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*311OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellants claiming repressed memory syndrome for sexual abuse perpetrated by respondent challenge the district court’s granting of summary judgment based on an expired statute of limitations. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Jeannette and Katie Bertram are sisters who both claim they were sexually abused by their uncle, Dr. James Poole, and that Linda Poole, his wife, consented to and was aware of this abuse. Katie alleges several instances of abuse that ended when she was twelve, but Jeanette reports a much more extensive history. Jeannette frequently babysat for the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- W.J.L. v. BuggeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- D.M.S. v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Doe v. Order of St. BenedictDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- D.M.S. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Bertram v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
- D.M.S. v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.