Legal Opinion
D.M.S. v. Barber
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 5, 2001No. C8-00-2227PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge
Appellant D.M.S. argues that the district court erred by dismissing his claims against respondent Professional Association of Treatment Homes (PATH) for injury from sexual abuse that occurred while he was in foster care, as time-barred. Because at the time appellant sued PATH, the statute of limitations had run on his negligence and respondeat superior claims against PATH, we affirm.
FACTS
D.M.S. was born on September 10, 1979. In the late summer of 1992, D.M.S. was placed, through PATH, in the foster home of defendant Kennedy Barber. Barber repeatedly sexually abused…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Lefto v. Hoggsbreath Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Benigni v. County of St. LouisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Donaldson v. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- D.M.S. v. BarberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001