Legal Opinion
Bertram v. Poole
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 20, 1999No. C5-99-136Published
1Opinion of the Court
597 N.W.2d 309 (1999)
Jeannette May BERTRAM, et al., Appellants,
v.
James POOLE, et al., Respondents.
No. C5-99-136.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 20, 1999.
Review Denied September 28, 1999.
Ronald R. Frauenshuh, Jr., Ortonville, for appellants.
Maury Beaulier, Bloomington, for respondents.
Considered and decided by AMUNDSON, Presiding Judge, G. BARRY ANDERSON, Judge, and FOLEY,[*] Judge.
OPINION
AMUNDSON, Judge.
Appellants claiming repressed memory syndrome for sexual abuse perpetrated by respondent challenge the district court's granting of summary judgment based on an expired statute of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Wittmer v. RuegemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- W.J.L. v. BuggeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.