Legal Opinion

Mitten v. Caswell-Runyan Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1912No. 7,615PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Prom Huntington Circuit Court; Charles F. Sturgis, Judge. Action by the Caswell-Runyan Company against Lewis C. Mitten and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFelt, J.

This was an action brought by the Caswell-Runyan Company against Lewis C. Mitten and his sureties upon a certain contractor’s bond, given for the construction of certain buildings. •

*522From a judgment for $2,000 this appeal was taken. The errors assigned are: (1) The overruling of appellants’ demurrer to the amended complaint; (2) the overruling of appellants’ demurrer to' the second paragraph of appellee’s reply to the second and third paragraphs of appellants’ answer; (3) error in the conclusion of law; (4) error in overruling appellants’ motion for a venire de novo; (5) overruling the motion…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. City of Anderson v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. City of Bridgeport v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Knotts v. Clark Construction Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Bump v. McGrannahanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Trook v. CrouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API