Legal Opinion

Legislative Redistricting Cases

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 5, 2006No. Misc. No. 37, September Term, 1991. Misc. Nos. 1, 5, 6, 16, 17, and 19, September Term, 1992PublishedCited by 31 opinions

September Term, 1991. September Term, 1992.

1Opinion of the Court

MURPHY, Chief Judge.

This case involves a number of challenges to the legality of Maryland’s Legislative Districting Plan, as enacted by Joint Resolutions 9 and 10 at the 1992 Session of the General Assembly.

I

To ensure that the membership of the General Assembly continuously reflects the evolving population shifts throughout the State, Article III, § 5 of the Maryland Constitution provides in part:

Following each decennial census of the United States and after public hearings, the Governor shall prepare a plan setting forth the boundaries of the legislative districts for electing of the members…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Vieth v. JubelirerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Marylanders for Fair Representation, Inc. v. SchaeferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1994
  3. Montgomery County v. REVERE NATIONAL CORP., INC.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  4. In Re Legislative Districting of the StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API