Legal Opinion

In Re Legislative Districting of the State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 26, 2002No. 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBell, C.J.

A majority of the Court concurring, by Order dated June 11, 2002, we concluded, for reasons to be set forth in an opinion later to be filed, that significant portions of the Governor’s 2002 Redistricting Plan were not consistent with the requirements of Article III, § 4, of the Constitution of Maryland that “[e]ach legislative district shall, consist of adjoining territory, be compact in form, and of substantially equal population” and that “[d]ue regard shall be given to natural boundaries and the boundaries of political subdivisions” and, for that reason, “the Plan [wa]s in violation of the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States v. HaysSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Pearson v. KosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  3. In re Senate Joint Resolution of Legislative Apportionment 1176Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
  4. Wilson v. KasichOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. The League of Women Voters of Florida, etc. v. Ken Detzner OpinionSupreme Court of Florida · 2015

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API