Legal Opinion
Lachtman v. Regents of University of California
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 20, 2007No. G037102PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Introduction
Shane Lachtman entered the graduate program in the history department (History Department) of the University of California, Irvine (UCI) in the fall of 2001. After his first year, Lachtman was informed of deficiencies in his academic performance and of certain requirements, including improvement in his writing, he needed to meet to advance to the Ph.D. program. In February 2003, three professors in the History Department evaluated Lachtman’s writing, determined it had not improved and was not good enough for the Ph.D. program, and concluded Lachtman displayed…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. HorowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sheppard v. North Orange County Regional Occupational ProgramCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wassmann v. S. Orange Cnty. Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- De Vries v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Page v. Miracosta Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Doe v. Univ. of S. Cal., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.