Oakes & Kanatz v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Romana Schmidt appeals from judgment entered against her for attorney’s fees and summary judgment against her on her counterclaim alleging negligent practice of law. She does not dispute the judgment against her for attorney’s fees, but appeals from the final judgment because this court dismissed a prior appeal from the summary judgment only as taken from a partial summary judgment.
Oakes & Kanatz, the respondent, moves to dismiss for Schmidt’s failure to provide an approved statement of the proceedings. We deny the motion because the record is adequate to review the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & EbersoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- Friesens, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Friesens, Inc. v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Oakes & Kanatz v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986