Legal Opinion

Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & Ebersold

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 9, 1984No. CX-84-32PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the appellant’s complaint against the respondents for legal malpractice. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

In 1979 the respondent law firm, and in particular J. Michael Rosso, Esq., commenced an action on behalf of the appellant Gary Virsen against one Gary K. Wold, a former business associate of the appellant, alleging wrongful conversion of property. Wold interposed a counterclaim and the matter was eventually settled for $2,000.00. The appellant accepted the settlement at a conference held in the presence of the Hon. Harold…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  3. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. Thayer v. American Financial Advisers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Willems v. Commissioner of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hyden v. LAW FIRM OF McCORMICK, ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Medical Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Oakes & Kanatz v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Cheryl C. Moore, M.D. v. Charles W. Grau, Esq. & a.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API