Legal Opinion
Oakes & Kanatz v. Schmidt
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 29, 1986No. CO-85-1829Published
1Opinion of the Court
391 N.W.2d 51 (1986)
OAKES & KANATZ, Respondents,
v.
Romana L. SCHMIDT, Appellant.
No. CO-85-1829.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
July 29, 1986.
Peter A. Bologna, Murnane, Conlin, White, Brandt & Hoffman, Saint Paul, for respondents.
M. Guy Ross, Limited Income Legal Assistance, Minneapolis, for appellant.
Heard, considered and decided by FORSBERG, P.J., and SEDGWICK and RANDALL, JJ.
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
Romana Schmidt appeals from judgment entered against her for attorney's fees and summary judgment against her on her counterclaim alleging negligent practice of law. She does not dispute the judgment…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Peterson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Virsen v. Rosso, Beutel, Johnson, Rosso & EbersoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Oakes & Kanatz v. SchmidtCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986